The New Atheism

                                      The New Atheism

     But then somehow, contrary to all of we have been taught to believe by Atheistic public schooling, “higher” academia, and the media, we tend to press on in defiance of such existentially meaningless and hopeless, materialistic conclusions. Generally speaking, most of the human species, carries on each day with the assumption that we are NOT worthless, as though we do have meaning and purpose, and as if there is some basis for right and wrong, despite the complete lack of any basis for such a thing being presented in the construct of Scientific Materialism.
       Well do to, Atheist shills like the Late Not-So-Great, Christopher Hitchens would have had us believe that right and wrong are written in the heart of each Man. Sounds reasonable enough, right? But wait! Written by whom? The difference between right and wrong is innate to our Evolutionary Nature? Is that it? But does not Nature operate solely within the moral rubric of kill or be killed and reproduction?  Now I am merely basing this upon what the Material Atheists say about Darwinian evolution, so this is not a Theistic attack on Darwinism, in any way. I am just stating what THEY BELIEVE.
       And so, there is always this flagrantly blatant DISCONNECT and transparently obvious fissure of contradiction running through the thinking and didactically condescending litanies of an armchair philosopher, New Atheists like Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, Lawrence M. Krauss, Bill Maher, Steven Pinker, A. C. Grayling, among others, including the Older New Atheist Guard like Bertrand Russell.
     They beg, borrow and steal the morality of Christianity, repackage it as Natural Law, and preach it as The Gospel Materialistic Atheism.
      It’s a ruse, a sleight of hand, a deliberate obfuscation of facts and history to achieve a desired biased outcome.
And they call this science???????
       That bluntly peremptory New Atheist, Sam Harris, had even gone so far as to claim Science, alone, is sufficient to instruct human morality, without any necessity for Christian Doctrine. Harris' book, The Moral Landscape,  and accompanying TED Talk, “How Science Can Determine Moral Values”, seeks to do just that. And yet again, the unanimous conclusions amongst scientists, with their unproven assumptions about random chance, chaotic, unguided, and meaningless Darwinian Evolutionary Theory, clearly assert that Natural Selection cares not for Absolute Moral Values. In their jungle of Moral Relativism, whatever works to advance the evolution of a species wins!
Moral Relativism is the feckless banner of The New Atheists.
If killing does the job, fine. If rape does the job fine. If cooperating does the job, fine. If social harmony does the job fine. If genocide does the job fine. If theft and betrayal does the job, fine.
Whatever works is the battle cry of Materialistic Evolutionary Theory.
     All The New Atheists are quickly revealed to be merely insipid pundits and stooges for Atheistic Scientism, ostentatiously sashaying around as remedial philosophic posers, charlatan Messiahs, fueled on the fleeting fumes of historically erroneously fraudulent scientific reasoning, revisionist history, and intentional moral deception.
Feet Firmly Planted in Mid Air!
     And so, getting back to Hitchens, inevitably he could not provide, in the same way, Science cannot provide anything along the lines of an Absolute Moral Compass. And of course, I suppose it was easy for Hitchens to wax so philosophically about all this, while sitting in his smoking-jacket, coming from a Cambridge education, where he dined on caviar and post-Gala, Havana Cigars, with the “Good Old Boys”…then Alma Mater, “well to doers”, who used a posh British accent to philosophize on how the rest of the world should just “learned to get along” without all those pesky, contrived, Christian-based guidelines like The Ten Commandments or Christian entreaties to, “Love Thy Neighbor As Thy Self”, practice Mercy and Forgiveness, and seek to “Do God’s Will”, above and beyond your innate human hardwiring to be selfish and territorially animalistic.
     Sure when you borrow and steal Christian morality, and deceptively call it innate and the result of Natural Law, it is easy to say all this. And it is easy to say as Hitchens’ paraded around with a corpulent belly, smoking and drinking himself into cancer and loathsome depression, finally. And it easy to say all this when you do not live in a ghetto where the natural, innate instincts of mankind are in full array, complete with theft, rape, murder, incest, and drug abuse. Who needs Christian Morality when we all possess “an innate drive to work in a socially harmonious way”, right? Everyone knows how harmonious they behave in the ghettos of Compton, right?
      Would it not be lovely for Richard Dawkins to take his little British girl, delicate flower, science teacher attitude to a ghetto in Compton to give a lecture on proper social etiquette and social demeanor? I want to see how “The Hood” reacts, as he pontificates on Atheistic Moral Codes, and the need to work together and function as a “social organism”, blah, blah, blah…Could you imagine?

      I mean that is what these guys are actually saying. I am not making this up.
One could go so far as to assert that…

 The New Atheism
 Is
The New Brain Damage…

     Just look at Richard Dawkins contributions to society via his book, The Selfish Gene, where we are taught that we have no free will at all and that it is merely our impersonal, “random chance created”??? WTF!? DNA that runs the entire show of human morality. We have zero say in the matter of our moral choices. It is all our……………………wait for it……………………. “SELFISH GENES”.
...Probably not talking Calvin Klein here…
    It is beyond ridiculous.
        It is intentionally vile and degrading to all humankind has ever done or thought or achieved. It debases all that humans have ever done or will do to mere biochemical reaction at the slime level.
        And don’t think for a second it this type of philosophy is pushed by accident. IT IS AN AGENDA…a Luciferian Agenda to debase and degrade Mankind so that Mankind is divorced from his natural inclination to reach out in higher consciousness to God. It is an ancient Kabbalistic, Satanic paradigm created to trap the minds of Humankind in a squalid cesspool of meaningless, random existence, where the reigning Gods are Apathy and Nihilism, which by default, compels the mind to reach out for The Luciferian New Age, Utopian New World Order all the more.

                                  --From The Scientism Delusion by Gregory Lessing Garrett

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Death of Atheistic Materialism        In the domain of Natural Science, events have natural causes which can be determined according to Natural Laws. However, Natural Science, due to overt Methodological Naturalism Confirmation Biases, which prevent it from entertaining any Supernatural explanations for natural effects, is ill-equipped to handle the problem of Supernatural causality. And that’s why Natural Science can say nothing about the Supernatural. It simply cannot test for something that it assumes is not there.        Natural Science is crippled under the burden of its own Methodological Naturalism prejudices. (Methodological Naturalism is a strategy for studying the world, by which scientists choose not to consider Supernatural causes, from intrinsic assumptions and biases about the world and in their approach to science, even as a remote possibility.)        Anything that Natura...
Read more
The Morally Myopic Atheist Letter to an Atheist:        “Your language use, limited and severely crippled understanding of science and philosophy, and degree of comprehension simply do not reflect intelligence at all. Methodological Naturalism is your only credential, I am sorry to inform you. I think you know this already an have become good at self-deception. Using the gatekeepers of peer review, in the monolithic field of Atheistic Materialism to prop your confused body up in neither impressive, compellingly persuasive, effective, nor advisable. What you have accomplished, however, is in effect to reveal to everyone listening to your inane speculations about reality that you live in The Dark Ages of Prejudice and Presupposition about reality. The very notion that Metaphysical plausibility is not a part of your lexicon of cognates is indicative of someone who has rarely, if ever, explored anything other than the narrow and myopic boundaries of his si...
Read more

When Empiricism Becomes Tyranny

Epistemic Autocracy              In the past, the elite manipulated the population through a more mystical belief system. In particular, there was the institution of Sun worship (typified by deities such as Osiris and Set). However, as antiquity gave way to modern history, this system of control began to lose its effectiveness. During the sixteenth century, the ruling class managed to co-opt a relatively new methodology of truth discernment…Science.                        Over the years, they would contaminate this institution with their own virulent strains of thought, including Metaphysical Naturalism, Radical Empiricism, Malthusianism, Darwinism, Behaviorism, Radical Environmentalism, etc. Many of these paradigms were derivative of their own occult doctrines, thinly veiled to appear as objective science. All of these concepts correlat...
Read more