The Luciferian Elite Plan for Apotheosis

The Death of Atheistic Materialism

       In the domain of Natural Science, events have natural causes which can be determined according to Natural Laws. However, Natural Science, due to overt Methodological Naturalism Confirmation Biases, which prevent it from entertaining any Supernatural explanations for natural effects, is ill-equipped to handle the problem of Supernatural causality. And that’s why Natural Science can say nothing about the Supernatural. It simply cannot test for something that it assumes is not there.

       Natural Science is crippled under the burden of its own Methodological Naturalism prejudices. (Methodological Naturalism is a strategy for studying the world, by which scientists choose not to consider Supernatural causes, from intrinsic assumptions and biases about the world and in their approach to science, even as a remote possibility.)

       Anything that Natural Science cannot identify, it categorizes as a non-existence thing. There are good reasons for this in that if descriptive syntax cannot be applied to the identification of an event or object, what is there to be said about its existence in the locus of Space-Time?

Further, A theory or hypothesis must be falsifiable to be scientific. And if it isn’t scientific, then science has nothing to say on the matter. So what does it mean to say that a hypothesis is falsifiable? It means that there is some way to prove it false. But why is that necessary? The problem is that in science it isn’t possible to prove a hypothesis true. This is because we always have to admit the possibility that in the future we will find some phenomenon that our theory can’t explain.

So in science, the only way to test a hypothesis is to try to prove it wrong. If you fail, then your hypothesis is considered correct until someone else finds a way to prove it wrong. Eventually, after enough evidence has amassed to support it, and no one has managed to prove it wrong, your hypothesis is considered a theory.

Theories are well-established hypotheses and are generally considered to be ‘true’. But they aren’t really, because they can still be proven wrong. This happened with Newton’s Law of Gravity, for example. It seemed to be true because it perfectly explained every observation. But then one day that upstart Einstein came along and found something Newton’s law couldn’t explain. And now we have General Relativity. We are still using Newton’s law because it works in most cases. But we know it isn’t ‘true’.

The whole point of falsification is that it allows a hypothesis to be tested. Science operates based on the principle of non-contradiction, which means that a statement can’t be both true and false at the same time (believe it or not, there is a whole branch of logic where this is not the case. It’s called paraconsistent logic). This principle is very helpful because it makes the idea of falsification possible and allows us to determine what is and is not a valid scientific hypothesis.

       If I tell you that 'flying pink monkeys exist' you can never prove me wrong. You can’t search the whole universe for flying pink monkeys. There will always remain the possibility that one exists somewhere. That’s not a valid scientific hypothesis.

      On the other hand, if I tell you 'flying pink monkeys do not exist', that is a valid scientific hypothesis. Why? Because if you ever do find one, you immediately prove me wrong. It is falsifiable. Science must always assume nonexistence of something until it is actually found.

       If we were to get rid of the principle of non-contradiction, then no hypothesis would be falsifiable, science would cease to exist.

       And so putting this all together, is the Supernatural falsifiable and testable? Can one find evidence of the Supernatural that proves its existence? What would the criterion be for such a test? For it is in the manner in which one defines what the “Supernatural” is that can we test for it. And so this entire debate the Atheist have with Theism about the existence of the Supernatural is completely pointless and meaningless if they cannot clearly define what it is they are testing for..what they are even looking for.

If Atheists are denying the existence of the Supernatural, and the Supernatural to them is a Bearded Old Man on a Cloud, and they cannot find such a Man, then they claim “we lack belief in Gods”.etc... But what if this definition is irrelevant to the claim that the Theist is making?

This is the classical Strawman attack that Atheists make upon Theists. Atheists tend to deny the evidence for things that Theists are not even claiming the existence of.

Then what is the Theist claiming? What they claim to be real, based upon their formidable boast of inductive, deductive, epistemological, Ontological, archeological, historical, and empirical evidence, is the high plausibility of a Supernatural causal agency to the natural world.

Essentially, what Theists are claiming, in other words, is the Non-Material World real, or dimensional, if you will, and does it support the material world? And if so, then is that testable? Is the claim falsifiable by the rules of science? Of course it is, as much as a quantum physics has identified a nonmaterial field of information and energy source, subterranean to the known natural world.

In a sense, the information-energy fields that quantum scientists deal with in theoretical models constitute the Supernatural spiritual world that Alchemical scientists, theologist, and metaphysicians have been talking about all along. How can I assert this? I can because I have no Methodological Naturalism Confirmation Biases which disallow me from entertaining Supernatural, nonmaterial quantum physics from my assessments.

Materialism was very popular when all we could measure was dust particles. But then we could measure molecules, then atoms, then subatomic particle probabilities, and there is nothing to suggest that the quantization of quantum information and energy will ever dimish in the infinite regress. At some point, we are not talking about mater at all. We are talking about nonmaterial quantum potentiality.

Quantum scientist often talk about “fields”, like “The Zero Point Field”, because they have no way of identifying any physical properties to these probabilistic entities. In quantum field theory, the vacuum state is the quantum state with the lowest possible energy; it contains no physical particles, and is the energy of the ground state. This is also called The Zero Point Energy.

Certainly such things satisfy most definitions for the Spirit and Supernatural essence.

We have already proven the existence of the Supernatural. It is just that Atheists are stuck in an archaic Methodological Naturalistic mindset, and their biases preclude them from catching up with the rest of the scientific community. They refuse to accept the evidence. They deny its existence, and then they say “Prove it!”. It is a ploy, a ruse, a Sophist’s game of deflection.

Further, we know from quantum physics that the observer affects the outcome of the observation, according to The Copenhagen Interpretation of the Double Slit Experiment. When you observe anything, there is a quantum wave function collapse which gives rise to what we experience and observe. If you look for something, you tend to see it due to the participation between you and the quantum field and the wave function collapse of whatever reality such participation brings to the surface. In linear algebra, an eigenvector or characteristic vector of a linear transformation is a non-zero vector that changes by only a scalar factor when that linear transformation is applied to it. In quantum mechanics, wave function collapse is said to occur when a wave function—initially in a superposition of several eigenstates—appears to reduce to a single eigenstate (by "observation").

But, where is the wave function collapse coming from? According to quantum science, The Universe is composed of NON-MATERIAL Information and Energy fields, with no measurable material components to it. Some quantum scientist like to say that the universe is “quantized” packets of information and energy at the quantum level or the Planck Scale, but ultimately, we are dealing with information and energy which merely has quantum potential with no way to measure any mass. It just emptiness. Yet it is something. Is not Spirit spoken of in similar language? Something that is invisible...just as quantum science describes the subterranean quantum foundation of the Universe.

Suddenly, the Transcendental Cosmological Model takes on a whole new dimension. It becomes a very palpable, highly plausible, very real, quantum deliberation, worthy of very serious consideration and study.

Natural Science doesn’t invoke or permit Supernatural causation. Its claims that since we have been dealing with measurable, quantized matter for so long, The Supernatural, with its nonmaterial component cannot be tested for to be falsifiable, so it is not a valid scientific hypothesis.

 Anyone who had looked into the Double Slit experiment, with its Copenhagen Interpretation has seen that science has observed photonic energy to be BOTH a particle and wave AT THE SAME TIME. This is impossible according to all the known laws of classical, mechanistic physics, and yet this is the massively popular conclusion of the top quantum physicists in the world. In theological terms such a paradox would be deemed a miracle.

In scientific in terms it is simply impossible, and yet it is so. And is that not what a theological miracle is...impossible, yet so? Beyond Natural Laws or Man’s knowledge to explain, we generally wait for a natural explanation. Atheists will insist natural causes are the only allowed explanations. But why? We do because we have been entrenched within a Material Atheistic paradigm for so long, we learned to just not question it. But quantum physics has changed all that.

This is a very important discovery which destroys the antiquated notion of Man not being able to test for the Supernatural, for under so many classical definitions of the Supernatural, what quantum physics is describing is merging to become identical to the Supernatural, as classical theologists have defined it.

The laws of quantum mechanics involve a random element, with no known mechanism. Individual photons passing through a polarizer, for example, seem to be indistinguishable, behave differently, seemingly at random. Is something that has no mechanism, Supernatural? It starts to fit the definition of Supernatural, but is it?

Atheists say no. Theists say yes. Who is right? Your Methodological Assumptions decide for you.

Here is why: There is this little matter of the much-debated interpretation of Quantum Mechanics involving a Double Slit Experiment. In modern physics, the double-slit experiment is a demonstration that light and matter can display characteristics of both classically defined waves and particles; moreover, it displays the fundamentally probabilistic nature of quantum mechanical phenomena. One view of the experimental results is called, “The Copenhagen Interpretation”, held by Werner Heisenberg, which holds that measurements take place when they are perceived by a conscious observer. Quantum mechanics cannot easily be reconciled with everyday language and observation, and has often seemed counter-intuitive to physicists, including its inventors. But, it appears to suggest that there is a “participatory effect” between the observer and the quantum field being observed... ”one effects the other”. Objectivity flys right out the window, and you see what you are expecting to see at some descriptive linguistic syntactical level, if you will.

But is quantum science a legitimate and sufficient Heuristic instrument to study the Supernatural? Quantum Mechanics is clearly superior to classical mechanics for the description of microscopic phenomena, and in principle works equally well for macroscopic phenomena. Hence it is at least plausible that the mathematical and logical structure of quantum mechanics better reflect physical reality than do their classical Newtonian counterparts. If this reasoning is accepted, quantum theory requires various changes in our view of physical reality relative to what was widely accepted before the quantum era, among them the following:

1. Physical objects never possess a completely precise position or momentum.

2. The fundamental dynamical laws of physics are stochastic and not deterministic, so from the present state of the world one cannot infer a unique future (or past) course of events.

3. The principle of unicity does not hold: there is not a unique exhaustive description of a physical system or a physical process. Instead, the reality is such that it can be described in various alternative, incompatible ways, using descriptions which cannot be combined or compared.

In essence, we are moving towards a Quantum Mystical explanation of reality at light speed, in spite of the vehement protestations of Newtonian Mechanistic Materialists.

But why is it embraced and talked about amongst the scientific community as such a paradox but true? And yet, any insinuation that we are tapping into a spiritual Supernatural component to reality is immediately omitted from the conversation. Why? It is because Natural Science has a Methodological Naturalism Confirmation Bias that precludes any allowance for what might be deemed as “Supernatural” into any dialogue or explanation of events or phenomena. It is a prejudice, and mental block and omission of data incompatible to a materialistic worldview.

However, quantum physics is changing all of that. Atheists can no longer get away with their pseudoscientific folly. Pantheistic Monadism and Quantum Mysticism have been being creeping through the hallowed halls of quantum science for over 50 years now, and the inevitable confession of a Supernatural spiritual basis to existence is becoming glaringly obvious.

As far as denying the existence of any supposed reports of the Supernatural just because Naturalistic Science has not been able to find evidence, it cannot be conclusive of anything except that to date no evidence has been found. To prove that anything does not, nor never has existed is just nearly impossible; to disprove anything; a lack of data cannot be as anything but inconclusive. Maybe Science has just missed something. And this is what is coming to the forefront of quantum science. We missed a lot. We missed it because our Material Atheistic biases blinded us to any scientific conclusions beyond The Dark Ages of our Mechanistic paradigm.

When we observe the physical world, we have the quantum function wave collapse observer effect to contend with. The observer effect would tell us that the very act of observing might have precluded any Supernatural happenings from taking place during our observation period. It would tell us that by using scientific methods to test for the Supernatural, we prevented the Supernatural from happening because our scientific methods demand a natural explanation. Atheists will forever NOT SEE anything Supernatural because the quantum function wave collapse works in participation with their observations and expectations, and regardless of the outcome, they will assign a Naturalistic interpretation to the data. Hence Atheists are not qualified to even participate in the testing of Supernatural data.

Lastly, in addition to the rather nonmaterial and ethereal nature of the quantum realm, there are the theoretical discoveries of Superstring Theory, M-Theory, and Bosonic String Theories to contend with. According to Superstring Theory, there are at least 10 dimensions in the universe, M-Theory actually suggests that there are 11 dimensions to spacetime, and Bosonic String Theories suggest 26 dimensions. So the material world is not even in the equation when you are dealing with this stuff. We are dealing with “fields’ and dimensions, and potentialities, and mathematical probabilities. All bets are off with regard to the hard-mechanistic Newtonian universe with its Dark Ages story of a strictly mechanistic material realm.

Additionally, much of this quantum science is indistinguishable to Hermetic and Kabbalistic doctrine, as well as Eastern Mysticism about the soul, interdimensional realms, and God. It is not any big revelation to realize that Modern Science is speaking the exact same language as ancient occultism. If you have any doubts just pick up a copy of The Tao of Physics by Fritjof Capra, the book that brought the mystical implications of subatomic physics to popular consciousness for the very first time—way back in 1975, or The Dancing Wu Li Masters by Gary Zukav, which relate ideas in quantum physics to Eastern mysticism.

And so, to conclude having an inherent Material Atheistic assumption to scientific outcomes, Naturalistic Atheists will not see any evidence for the Supernatural. They simply cannot test for something that they assume is not there. Confirmation biases disqualify them form generating, reviewing, or assessing the evidence and data.

All the findings of quantum science and its connections to the Ontologically Supernatural doctrines and revelations of Transcendental Cosmology, from both Eastern and Western Mysticism are dolefully glossed over by The Atheist, and presumptively rejected from consideration through the filters of the myopic channels of their obtuse Methodological Naturalistic Confirmation Biases.